- Journalism, bombs, and other rant-esque things...

tygerversionx- November 21st, 2012
Okay, so I've woken up about the time in the repeat in AC360 where they replayed the explosions that happened in Gaza where Anderson ducked and there was the big flashes of light and then when they had audio running you could hear the booms, too.
This is where I get rant-y about the role of on-site journalism. Because I've seen in comments sections "Why do journalists go to the edge of beaches when a hurricane is coming in? What do they expect to happen when they go into a place where rockets are falling and exploding? Shouldn't they expect it's not safe? Why is this news?"
While I can agree the whole "let me be right by the ocean when the wind or a wave can carry me off my feet" thing ... (it annoyed me during Sandy) ... the whole "why do journalists go into a war zone and aggrandize their close calls with bombs in the background and why do they even look surprised?" line of questioning annoys the hell out of me more.
This is probably my own journalism degree that annoys me, because it seems the people that ask that don't get it. They go to these places because they want to show us what's really happening. There's a difference between being told there are a lot of bombings going on and being SHOWN by journalists what being near one of those explosions is like. I don't think situations like that are self-aggrandizing "look how brave I am" pieces. Yeah, they're being somewhat cavalier about their lives. But it's a hell of a lot easier to understand the magnitude of what's going on (at least in my mind) to people when --- on camera --- you see the fireball, you see the journalist shaken and possibly fall, and you hear the huge boom as the explosion happens.
I think there's a generation of people who have never been close to that kind of danger, and if a journalist is knocked off their feet, a journalist you recognize and have come to know over several years, you start to get personally involved in a situation. It's not just cold "oh, Hamas and Israel are lobbing explosive stuff at each other again" numbers. It gives at least a chance that the viewer will go "oh my god, this is seriously happening to people, every single day."
But then those comments show up and try to discount the footage, or the journalist, into a "well, you deserve it for going there" situation. And I see that as part of the problem such journalism is trying to fight against. They're doing what they can to present the problems in a way that shows how it affects human beings. Even if there's a chance they'll get hurt. They're trying to make people care about the news instead of just absorbing it and putting it aside.
Here are the rants that you get from me in the middle of the night when my back hurts and I feel like some people are being intentionally dense.